Global Climate Change has become the main issue of the 21st Century. Over the past 100 years the earth’s climate has warmed approximately 0.6 degrees celsius, with this figure set to rise to between 2% and 6% over the next 100 years. For a recap of global warming and a possible solution, see the video below:
Joking aside, this warming will alter habitats across the globe. In the northern hemisphere, where most research takes place, species tend to migrate northwards or to higher altitudes. However the landscape of today is much different compared to the post glacial period, as the presence of humans often provides barriers to migration. Species, however, do not react to average temperature rises, rather to regional changes which are highly specially heterogeneous (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Spatial variability in annual temperature since 1976 relative to 1961 and 1990 baselines (% degree per decade) (Walther et al. 2002)
Themes such as study of phenology, range and community shifts and ecosystem dynamics will be used to explore the consequences of the warming. Also considered will be possible genetic adaptations to global climate change such as changes in body size and natural events such as flowering and egg laying. This blog will explore how species will react to the changing climate and discover whether the earth will become Too Hot To Handle.
My interest in the area of biogeography, specifically species migration, stems from an enjoyment of studying a large range of species as well as how they behave. It is how species are located spatially and temporally as well as how they distribute that fascinates me. I also believe it is important for species conservation, as an understanding of species resiliency and adaptation techniques will help us protect future global biodiversity.
The main papers that I will be studying will focus on different species and their adaptation to changing climates including historical, modern-day and future struggles. I will also be examining the key themes of species migration modeling such as the bioclimate envelope as well as theories such as isolated refugia. The blog will follow a range of bird, animal and plant species.
hey bud,
ReplyDeletelooking forward to some brilliant following of the bird species - think i'm in for a real treat!
keep it cool (get it? climate change pun)
x
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI am very intrigued by your post, and will be following it closely!
I have a question though that you may be able to answer...
Recently I read up on an article by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, about a recent conference.
I question if CITES has the political will to protect economically valuable marine species like sharks. Scientific support for listing these shark species just couldn’t compete with dirty politics.
My question to you is that (and I would rather appreciate a detailed answer), if CITES would be able to put the politics aside, and compete in an international subsidation for the rescue and protection of these elegant species?
I look forward to your response!
Best,
Kimbo Putnam
Dear Mr Putnam,
ReplyDeleteWhile technically this question does not fall under the specific subject of this blog, I will embrace the question that this social medium has allowed you to ask.
I myself was very frustrated at the outcome of the CITES meeting last year in Qatar as proposed protection for sharks, tuna and coral were rejected. The 'dirty politics' that you describe comes, quite predictably, down to the economic value of the proposed species. One such species, the bluefin tuna, can fetch up to $100,000 per fish and hence it is easy to see how it did not reach protected status.
One has to question whether CITES works as a facilitating body, or whether new means of determining which species are protected has to be found. But what such means are there?
In specific answer to your question, no, I do not believe that CITES has the power or will to forgo short term economic gain in favour of a sustainable method for the future. While this may be regrettable, until there is sufficient movement behind the cause, and the paradigm shifts in the favour of conservation, these battles will be fought again and again.
Aside - To rub salt in the wound, the Japanese Embassy the day before the vote served bluefin tuna to its guests.
Further debate is more than welcome and thank you for the question,
Henry Goodchild
hi Henry, nice to see you entering into a blog debate already. The video is no longer now available to see- maybe try and use another example?
ReplyDeleteThe topic you've chosen is quite vast - if you need to focus down later on in the blog, that would be perfectly acceptable.
Dear Anson,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment the video should be working now. I will also take on board your advice and incorporate it into subsequent posts.
Regards,
Henry Goodchild